Oct 26

MROSD Use & Management Meeting 2 pm Wednesday, November 2

This is a rare opportrunity to get some more trails open to bikes!

The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (MROSD) Use & Management Committee will meet 2 pm Wednesday, November 2 at their offices at 330 Distel Circle in Los Altos. They will “review the status of four trails that are currently closed on an interim basis to bicycling and/or equestrian use…” The trails are Black Mountain in Rancho San Antonio, Zinfandel Trail in Picchetti Ranch, Ridge Trail (south of Horseshoe Lake) in Skyline Ridge, and Soda Gulch Trail in Purisima Creek Open Space Preserves. For full agenda. (If the agenda isn’t there yet, it will be soon, they promise me. Otherwise bug them at 650-691-1200.)

Please consider attending the meeting or send an email to the entire board.

Some points you can make in your communication are:

  • Cyclists should not be discriminated against. We should have access to the same quality trails as hikers and equestrians, instead of just steep, exposed fire roads.
  • Regional and longer connecting trails reduce cyclist density at trailheads providing more, positive user experiences for everyone.
  • Studies show that mountain biking does not damage trails any more than hiking.
  • Opening trails to cyclists that create 5, 10, 15 mile loops in underused preserves reduces density in more popular preserves.

Oct 20

ECdM Use & Mgt Meeting 10/22/2005 – Parking and Steam Donkey

MROSD’s Use and Management Committee is holding a public meeting at El Corte de Madera Open Space Preserve at the top of Gordon Mill Fireroad (gate CM03) on Saturday, October 22, at 1:00pm. The agenda includes discussion of the development plan for a parking lot and staging area between gates CM03 and CM04.

Also, they will talk about the proposed ealignment of the Steam Donkey Trail. This would *probably* be a completely new trail from the top of “Voodoo” (where Steam Donkey meets Gordon Mill about 1.5 miles from the top of Gordon Mill), to create a mild-grade, 6 to 8 foot wide, “Blue Hair” type trail up to the new parking area, including closure of the existing trail alignment where it drops from the green gate (gate 4.5). It’s possible the proposal will include extending this trail over to gate CM05 on Bear Gulch Road (top of Springboard fireroad) – but note, I’m really not sure. According to the current Use and Management plan for the preserve, the realigned trail is intended to serve many users including hiking groups, and will probably be built with the Sweco trail dozer, like the Sierra Morena
trail. Map

Oct 20

Sierra Azul and Bear Creek Master Plan 11/10/2005

MROSD has scheduled the second public workshop for the creation of

the Sierra Azul and Bear Creek Master Plan for 11/10 at 7pm at the Los Gatos Neighborhood Center. These two preserves make up approximately 1/3 of all MROSD land holdings. They are offering all user groups the opportunity to take part in shaping a long term management plan.

Please attend if at all possible for input on developing trail systems to link open spaces, provide access to destinations like Mt. Umunhum, alternatives to steep fire roads and pavement.

Aug 29

September – October Mountain Cyclist Online

The latest issue of ROMP’s newsletter, The Mountain Cyclist, is now avaliable online.
8.5 x 11 version
Tabloid version

Aug 06

Huddart / Wunderlich Master Plan Goes to Supervisors with Dirt Bike Route to Sky

I attended the San Mateo County Parks Commission meeting today with Jim Sullivan, Josh Moore, and a nice cyclist from the Woodside Bicycle Committee whose name seems to have slipped from my brain (sorry). Jim and Josh and the Woodside cyclist all spoke well, in favor of including bikes in the plan. There were also about two dozen equestrians, whose unanimous refrain was “keep bikes off the trails.” I prepared a couple of maps and a letter to the commission and spoke briefly, making a specific request that accommodation for bicycles be provided to allow us to ride up to the ridge without having to be on the busy highways. I showed how a trail could be built south of Kings Mountain Road that would not intersect with other trails currently used by horses with the exception of the Bay Area Ridge Trail.

Despite the seemingly impossible odds, Commissioner Bern Smith made a motion at the end of all the presentations and discussion, to forward the Draft Master Plan to the Board of Supervisors with the condition that staff identify a route for bicycles up through the parks to the ridge. The motion was seconded by Chair Richard Biederman. There was discussion about whether a route should be specified, such as a trail or perhaps Bear Gulch Road, and the motion was amended to simply state “a route.” There was discussion about whether this represented a recommendation to lift the ban on bikes system wide, and Chair Biederman said that times change and maybe it’s time to re-evaluate this restriction and start with this one Park. On this commission, there are five seats. One seat is vacant. Another commissioner (Mel Pincus) was absent. The fifth seat is held by a woman, Marian Vanden Bosch, who was present, and her vote was no. So the motion carried 2-1.

I left the meeting feeling rather parched. It seemed surreal. Sully was there outside the room and we gave each other hugs. We talked about whether we should pursue the boycott of the Tour de Peninsula, and decided it would be best to just drop the subject at this point and see if the support for cycling made it through the process with the Board of Supervisors. In the hall we met Bill Korbholz, who is on the Board of Directors of the San Mateo County Parks Foundation. I told him that we really would prefer to be supporters of the foundation rather than opponents, and given the vote, we had decided that at this time we would not be opposing the TdP fundraiser. He thanked us and said the news made him very happy. The new Director, David Holland, also stopped to talk in the hall. He said that as the Director of Recreation Programs for the US Forest Service, he’s heard all these complaints about multi-use before. I told him I was really happy to see a new face and a new perspective at San Mateo County Parks and I hoped he enjoyed his new job.

So I’m very grateful for having made this small inroad with San Mateo County Parks. We owe a great deal of thanks to Commissioner Smith for listening to our requests and taking the initiative to include them in the plan. The equestrian community is sure to come out strongly against this and will be writing letters and lobbying the Board of Supervisors. They are sure to push for the route to be Bear Gulch Road and not an actual trail. With their money and connections it will be difficult to keep the support we have. It will require a lot of work on our part for this amendment to remain in the plan in the end with a trail open to bikes in Woodside. But at least the door is open a crack. You can read my letter and look at the proposed route at http://www.stanford.edu/~imahorse/norcamba Cheers,

Patty

Patty Ciesla
Executive Director
Northern California Mountain Bicycling Association
PO Box 785
Los Altos, CA 94023-0785
650-917-1741
patty.ciesla@norcamba.org
www.norcamba.org

Jun 28

CANCELLED: Boycott Tour de Peninsula

Tour de Peninsula funds San Mateo County Parks and Recreation, which does not permit bikes on dirt. We love parks, but we want to ride our bikes in them too. Help us boycott San Mateo’s Tour de Peninsula.

San Mateo County Parks(SMCP) has just completed it’s master plan meeting for Huddart-Wunderlich parks. Let’s just call it what it really is to mountain bike riders, a disaster plan .

Bicyclists are relegated to the same paved surfaces within these parks that trucks and cars frequent, and nothing else.

We have no options of a Bay-to-Skyline dirt path ride, even though parks 4WD service vehicles access fireroads that parallel Kings Mt Rd.

There are no options for kids when at the picnic areas of riding the short bunny loop style trails that intertwine these popular areas.

What transpired at a series of “public” meetings was nothing short of a sham. Numerous requests by local bicycle riders at every one of the meetings for off pavement riding options, were denied, and the end result of this so called public input affair is ZERO access for bike riders.

Every step of the way, the equestrian crowd at the meetings bemoaned the lack of areas they have to ride unimpeded by the bicyclists that frequent other trails areas South of Page Mill Road.

To see what the equestrians actually have as far as trails opportunities, I did some research.

Here is a list of lands open to equestrians northwest of Page Mill Road, mostly in San Mateo County:

1. Pescadero Creek Cty Park: all trails open to horses – 6,000 acres-

no bikes allowed

2. Phleger Estate – all trails open to horses – 1,257 acres – no bikes allowed

3. Sam McDonald City park – all trails open to horses – 995 acres with stables –

no bikes allowed

4. San Bruno Mountain City Park- all trails open to horses

5. Huddart Park – all trails open to horses – 973 acres – no bikes allowed

6. Wunderlich Park – all trails open to horses-942 acres with stables – no bikes allowed

7. San Pedro Valley county park – All trails except Brooks Creek and Brooks View trails open to horses – 1,000 acres – no bikes allowed

8. Windy Hill OSP – Horses allowed on all trails except the Anniversity trail – 1,132 acres

9. Skyline Trail- all open to horses – (8.5 miles total) – no bikes allowed

10. Larry Lane Trail – open for horses – 1.75 miles- no bikes allowed

11. Portola Valley trails – all open to Horses – 250 acres – no bikes allowed

12. Los Trancos OSP- all open to horses except fault trail – 274 acres –

no bikes allowed

13. Edgewood County park – all open to horses – 467 acres – no bikes allowed

The total acreage open to equestrians including trails shared

with bikes -20,711.

Approximate total acreage with trails open to bikes under San Mateo County Parks and Recreation�0.

Bicycle accessible acreage – 7,421

Does this look like diminishing access to you? The other user groups have it pretty good in SMCO public parks, and they’ll say and do anything to preserve their status quo within Huddart- Wunderlich Parks.

I’ve personally heard statements by participants of these meetings like “it’ll be over our dead bodies that your ilk will ever ride bikes within these parks” and,”it’s not that we don’t like bicycles, it’s the bicyclists we have a problem with” by the NIYBY’s (not in YOUR back yard) crew.

Note that open to equestrians and hikers only on public lands northwest of Page Mill -13,290 acres. Total acres open to equestrians in San Mateo County Parks�9,435 acres

Here are the parks open to cyclists:(please note, ALL these lands are also open to equestrians and hikers):

1. Arastradero Preserve(city of Palo Alto)- open to horse and mountain bikes- 600 acres

2. Alpine Rd. Trail- 3 miles – open to horses and mountain bikes

3.Coal Creek OSP (MROSD) – 476 acres- open to horses and mountain bikes

4. El Corte De Madera OSP(MROSD)- 2,789 acres- open to horses and mountain bikes

5. Sweeney Ridge (GGNRA)- 1,047 acres- open to horses and

mountain bikes

6. McNee Ranch State Park- all trails open to horses and mountain bikes

7. Purisima Creek Redwoods OSP(MROSD)- 2,509 acres- Horses and mountain bikes allowed on all trails except the Soda Gulch trail and the footpath from North Skyline parking lot.

8. Windy Hill OSP, Spring Ridge trail(fireroad) 2 1/2 miles.

Total approximate acreage with trails open to mountain bikes and equestrians northwest of Page Mill Rd. – 7,421

Huddart-Wunderlich parks, both publicly owned and funded lands are shut out to all things bicycle except paved roads, and for SMCP’s, the gist is, we’ll take your hard earned tax dollars to maintain these parks, pay you lip service and then refuse bicyclists even minimal access to dirt paths.

If you decide to include your bike in your park experience, just ride it on the pavement, with the cars and trucks.

What to do Now

San Mateo residents, please contact all SMCO Supervisors. Let them know your not happy about being totally excluded from SMCP lands if riding a bicycle is what you do.(Sawyer Camp trail is great for beginner and family style riding, same with bicycle Sundays on Canada Rd.). Let them know you would appreciate having some of the same options as our fellow dirt trails users, things like extended loops on dirt, Bay-to-Skyline routes, bunny loops for kids, etc.

Ask the Supervisors to support the repeal of the blatantly anti-bicycle ordinance which forbids bicycles from dirt trails.

Don’t participate in the Tour De Peninsula, coming on August 7th in Redwood City that taps cyclists directly as fund sources that benefit SMCP.

Jun 20

California Bill Promises New Trails

Sacramento is considering legislation under which California reservoir and watershed managers would receive citizen input and consider recreational use of their lands, including trail access. This means powerful agencies like the Marin Municipal Water District (overseeing a large trail network on Mt. Tamalpais) and the East Bay Municipal Utility District (with extensive trails in Alameda and Contra Costa counties) would be required to consider public commentary when they decide how to deal with trails.
IMBA is part of a coalition of recreation and conservation groups that have endorsed Assembly Bill 672. Assembly Member Johan Klehs, of San Leandro, authored this trail-friendly bill. KEY POINTS:

* Across the state, reservoir and watershed managers have inconsistent policies regarding recreation and trail opportunities on watershed lands.
* Under AB 672, reservoir and watershed managers would set up a mechanism to consider recreation and trail opportunities on their lands.
* The legislation will create a great opportunity for all kinds of trail users to participate in a process that could provide many new recreational activities. It is endorsed by diverse organizations, including the California League of Conservation Voters, California Bicycle Coalition, Bay Area Ridge Trail Council, East Bay Regional Park District, International Mountain Bicycling Association, Northern California Mountain Biking Association, and Bicycle Trails Council of the East Bay.
* The legislation will enable trail enthusiasts to help watershed agencies establish plans that will balance water quality, environmental protection, and the recreation and health needs of the community.
* Don’t forget to sign your letter, and to mention where you live!

HOW TO MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD:

* Write a letter or send an e-mail to your state senator in support of AB 672
* Phone calls work too, but written communication is preferable
* Copy your letter to Assembly Member Johan Klehs
* Another copy of your communication should go to Senate co-sponsor Tom Torklakson

Go here to find your state Senator

Contact Assembly Member Klehs:

The Hon. Johan Klehs
California State Assembly
Room 5150, State Capitol
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento CA 94249-0018

E-mail form for Senator Klehs

Phone number: (916) 319-2018
Fax number: (916) 319-2118

Contact Senator Torlakson:

The Hon. Tom Torlakson
California State Senate
State Capitol, Room 4032
Sacramento CA 95814

E-mail address: Senator.Torlakson@sen.ca.gov
Phone number: (916) 651-4007
Fax number: (916) 445-2527

MORE INFORMATION ON AB 672

Under AB 672, agencies like the Marin Municipal Water District (that oversees a large trail network on Mt. Tamalpais), the East Bay Municipal Utility District (with extensive trails in Alameda and Contra Costa counties and 25 miles of trails in the Mokelumne area of the Sierra Nevada foothills), the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (with land interests around the Bay Area and in the Sierra Nevada), and the Contra Costa Water District would establish citizen advisory committees for recreational access. They in turn could recommend increased trail access, including mountain bike access.

Across the state, reservoir and watershed managers are inconsistent in their recreation policies. California trail enthusiasts have been trying for years to persuade public watershed-owning land managers to open their trail systems to the public if it is safe to do so. But there has been no requirement that the agencies hear the requests, and some have all but ignored them. Assembly Member Klehs told the Contra Costa Times (April 6, 2005), “We want the [local watershed agencies] to design the recreation programs. But it’s not acceptable to say. ‘No public access allowed. Go away and don’t bother us.’ ” AB 672 would create a procedure for the watershed agencies to gather citizen input. This could mean access to trails that are currently closed to bicycles.

AB 672 will enable trail users to recommend plans that balance water quality, resource protection, and the recreation and health needs of the community. The bill is endorsed by such diverse groups as the California League of Conservation Voters, California Bicycle Coalition, Bay Area Ridge Trail Council, East Bay Regional Park District, IMBA, Northern California Mountain Biking Association, and Bicycle Trails Council of the East Bay. Well-known outdoors columnist Tom Stienstra has written glowingly about AB 672 in the San Francisco Chronicle. The June 9 edition of the San Francisco Chronicle also has a feature story about AB 672. We are sure AB 672 will be good for mountain biking if it passes.

On June 2, AB 672 passed in the California Assembly by a vote of 67 to 9. Now the bill is heading for the state Senate, where � despite all of the endorsements mentioned above � its passage is in doubt. To get all the way through the Assembly, only to fail in the Senate, would be tragic.

Please contact (1) your state Senator, (2) Assembly Member Klehs, and (3) state Senate co-sponsor Tom Torklakson in support of AB 672. Writing a letter is best; e-mail or a phone call are acceptable alternatives. Please take one of these actions today if possible, because time is of the essence.

Older posts «

» Newer posts